All news
Politics
Business
Technology
Incidents
Sports
Weather
Science
Entertainment
World
Real Estate
AI News
From autonomous cyberattacks to apocalyptic alerts: the path that forced AI giants to call for a brakePhoto by Bru-nO on Pexels
AI News

From autonomous cyberattacks to apocalyptic alerts: the path that forced AI giants to call for a brake

Público14 September 2026 at 19:17

Several incidents involving artificial intelligence systems revealed new capabilities and security flaws that prompted a shift in position among leaders of companies developing these technologies. For the first time, top figures in the sector publicly advocate the need to slow down the pace of AI development.

Among the highlighted concerns are autonomous cyberattacks carried out using AI systems, which demonstrated an unprecedented level of sophistication. These incidents exposed how technology can be weaponized in ways that escape the control of its creators.

The apocalyptic alerts issued by experts and the companies themselves emerge against a backdrop of increasing vulnerability exposure. AI systems revealed unexpected capabilities that raise questions about the existential risks associated with their accelerated development.

This moment marks a break with the previous stance of major tech companies, which until now had driven rapid AI advancement without significant restrictions. The convergence of security incidents and warnings about the dangers of unregulated technology appears to have forced industry giants to change their narrative and call for a brake on development.

Why this matters

The article addresses how AI systems are developing capabilities that pose security risks, affecting technology companies, governments, and common internet users who may be affected by potential cyberattacks or AI-related threats. This follows a pattern of increasingly powerful AI systems being released without adequate security measures, leading industry leaders to reconsider the pace of development.

About this summary

This is our short summary of a report published by Público on 14 September 2026 at 19:17; the full text stays with the publisher. In our feed it sits under AI News. We currently carry 717 items in that section.

All items in this section →
Source

Related articles

AI News

Why Anthropic co-founder defends mandatory 'kill switch' for AI

Jack Clark, Anthropic's policy director and co-founder, defended to the BBC the need for a mandatory 'kill switch' for artificial intelligence systems, arguing that details about its requirements and verification should be part of the broader political discussion on AI. Clark emphasized that this measure is essential to ensure safety and human control over increasingly sophisticated AI systems.

BBC News Brasil14/09/26, 22:50
AI News

Concern about the use of AI: "I think none of the experts have managed to explain to the world what is at stake"

A specialist expressed concerns about the use of artificial intelligence, stating that none of the experts have managed to explain to the world what is really at stake. The specialist also raised the question of the practical viability of creating effective mechanisms for controlling and regulating the technology.

Now14/09/26, 22:40
Porque é que os líderes mundiais da tecnologia estão a pedir um travão ao desenvolvimento da IA?
AI News

Why are world tech leaders calling for a brake on AI development?

World tech leaders, such as executives from Anthropic, SpaceX, Google and OpenAI, are calling for a slowdown in the development of Artificial Intelligence, expressing concern about the risks associated with this technology. Donald Trump opposes this position, accusing there being a conspiracy against AI and data centers.

SIC Notícias14/09/26, 21:59
Tempestade na Inteligência Artificial: Trump e JD Vance já falaram e não estão a dizer a mesma coisa
AI News

Storm in Artificial Intelligence: Trump and JD Vance Have Spoken and Are Not Saying the Same Thing

President Trump considers that the calls from leaders of major tech companies to slow down and oversee the development of artificial intelligence are merely a "sick conspiracy," while Vice President JD Vance disagrees and argues that "intelligent" AI regulation is necessary. The apparent divergence between the two leaders raises questions about the direction of AI policy in the United States.

Expresso14/09/26, 20:57